Developments, Odds & Ends

Taylor-Wimpey change plans for behind the church

Many Bloxham residents attended the Taylor Wimpey consultation regarding possibile development behind the church.  Whilst not supporting the application which still poses a number of important problems for Bloxham’s strained infrastructure – especially primary school places – the proposed development did have some redeeming features.

Note the past-tense “did” because the outline planning application (15/00369/F ) recently submitted to CDC looks quite different to the one shown at the consultation displays.
TW have increased the proposed number of dwellings from 30 to 37, an almost 25% increase in density.   In so doing they have taken a major step backward towards a standard “off-the-peg estate no matter where it might be”  design strategy.  Given this we certainly hope TW will not be presenting any responses to the initial public consultation as evidence in favour of what is now a totally different development.

Play it again Sam
Play it again Sam

What a pity TW didn’t really listen to the feedback  about the significant demand in Bloxham for high quality downsize housing of character.   One might have thought that this site, right on the edge of the conservation area, could at least have prompted a little reflection along these lines.    We know homes  in a lower-density  ‘non urban-estate configuration’ with proper parking and built-in adaptability to the needs of an ageing population could demand a substantial premium – but I guess such thinking may have  required a degree of  imagination not factored into the standard spreadsheet algorithms used by large developers.  It’s so much easier to just keep rolling out the same old high-density estates up and down the UK until you don’t have to worry about local character because everywhere looks the same!

In the film “Casablanca” Humphrey Bogart apparently never does say “Play it again Sam.”
In contrast  it seems that the large UK builders of today find it hard to imagine saying anything else.

What a pity!

 

Click to enlarge

 

Because it is so hard to access the information via the CDC website we’ve added a copy of the full site plan consultation document here.

 

 

 

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.